6
R
E
D
E
E
M

18
5
4
5
5
13

+
=
50
5+0
=
5

1+8

1+3

9

4

5
4
5
5

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1

9
5
4
5
5
4

+
=
32
3+2
=
5

FIVE
5

6
R
E
D
E
E
M

18
5
4
5
5
13

+
=
50
5+0
=
5

9
5
4
5
5
4

+
=
32
3+2
=
5

FIVE
5

8
R
E
D
E
E
M
E
R

18
5
4
5
5
13
5
18

+
=
73
7+3
=
10
1+0
=
1

1+8

1+3

1+8

9

4

9

5
4
5
5

5

+
=
24
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1

9
5
4
5
5
4
5
9

+
=
46
4+6
=
10
1+0
=
1
ONE
1

8
R
E
D
E
E
M
E
R

18
5
4
5
5
13
5
18

+
=
73
7+3
=
10
1+0
=
1

9
5
4
5
5
4
5
9

+
=
46
4+6
=
10
1+0
=
1
ONE
1

19

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1
4
S
A
F
A

19
1
6
1

+
=
27
2+7
=
9

1+9

10

1+0

1

1
6
1

+
=
8

1
1
6
1

+
=
9

NINE

9

4
S
A
F
A

19
1
6
1

+
=
27
2+7
=
9

1
1
6
1

+
=
9

NINE

9

 

19

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1
6
S
C
A
R
A
B

19
3
1
18
1
2

+
=
44
4+4
=
8

1+9

1+8

10

9

1+0

1

3
1

1
2

+
=
7

1
3
1
9
1
2

+
=
17
1+7
=
8

EIGHT
8

6
S
C
A
R
A
B

19
3
1
18
1
2

+
=
44
4+4
=
8

1
3
1
9
1
2

+
=
17
1+7
=
8

EIGHT
8

19

19

+
=
38
3+8
=
11
1+1
=
2
6
S
C
A
R
A
B
S

19
3
1
18
1
2
19

+
=
63
6+3
=
9

1+9

1+8

1+9

10

9

10

1+0

1+0

1

1

3
1

1
2

+
=
7

1
3
1
9
1
2
1

+
=
18
1+8
=
9

NINE
9

6
S
C
A
R
A
B
S

19
3
1
18
1
2
19

+
=
63
6+3
=
9

1
3
1
9
1
2
1

+
=
18
1+8
=
9

NINE
9

19

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1

4
S
U
R
A

19
21
18
1

+
=
59
5+9
=
14
1+4
=
5

1+9
2+1
1+8

10
3
9

1+0

1

1

+
=
1

1
3
9
1

+
=
14
1+4
=
5

FIVE
5

4
S
U
R
A

19
21
18
1

+
=
59
5+9
=
14
1+4
=
5

1
3
9
1

+
=
14
1+4
=
5

FIVE
5

14

8

14

+
=
36
3+6
=
9

11
T
U
T
A
N
K
H
A
M
E
N

20
21
20
1
14
11
8
1
13
5
14

+
=
128
1+2+8
=
11

1+1

=

2

2+0
2+1
2+0

1+4
1+1

1+3

1+4

2
3
2

5
2

4

5

1

8
1

5

+
=
15
1+5
=
6

2
3
2
1
5
2
8
1
4
5
5

+
=
38
3+8
=
11
1+1
=

2

TWO

2

11
T
U
T
A
N
K
H
A
M
E
N

20
21
20
1
14
11
8
1
13
5
14

+
=
128
1+2+8
=
11

1+1

=

2

2
3
2
1
5
2
8
1
4
5
5

+
=
38
3+8
=
11
1+1
=

2

TWO

2

14

8

14

+
=
36
3+6
=
9

11
T
U
T
A
N
K
H
A
M
U
N

20
21
20
1
14
11
8
1
13
21
14

+
=
144
1+4+4
=
9

2+0
2+1
2+0

1+4
1+1

1+3
2+1
1+4

2
3
2

5
2

4
3
5

1

8
1

+
=
10
1+0
=
1

2
3
2
1
5
2
8
1
4
3
5

+
=
36
3+6
=
9
NINE
9

11
T
U
T
A
N
K
H
A
M
U
N

20
21
20
1
14
11
8
1
13
21
14

+
=
144
1+4+4
=
9

2
3
2
1
5
2
8
1
4
3
5

+
=
36
3+6
=
9
NINE
9

14

15
14

+
=
43
4+3
=
7

10
T
U
T
-
A
N
K
-
A
M
O
N

20
21
20

1
14
11

1
13
15
14

+
=
130
1+3+0
=
4

2+0
2+1
2+0

1+4
1+1

1+3
1+5
1+4

2
3
2

5
2

4
6
5

1

1

+
=
2

2
3
2

1
5
2

1
4
6
5

+
=
31
3+1
=
4
FOUR
4

10
T
U
T
-
A
N
K
-
A
M
O
N

20
21
20

1
14
11

1
13
15
14

+
=
130
1+3+0
=
4

2
3
2

1
5
2

1
4
6
5

+
=
31
3+1
=
4
FOUR
4

9

+
=
9

3
T
Y
I

20
25
9

+
=
54
5+4
=
9

2+0
2+5

2
7

9

+
=
9

2
7
9

+
=
18
1+8
=
9
NINE
9

3
T
Y
I

20
25
9

+
=
54
5+4
=
9

2
7
9

+
=
18
1+8
=
9
NINE
9

26

26

+
=
52
5+2
=
7

6
Z
A
M

Z
A
M

26
1
13

26
1
13

+
=
80
8+0
=
8

2+6

1+3

2+6

1+3

8

4

8

4

1

1

+
=
2

8
1
4

8
1
4

+
=
26
2+6
=
8
EIGHT
8

6
Z
A
M

Z
A
M

26
1
13

26
1
13

+
=
80
8+0
=
8

8
1
4

8
1
4

+
=
26
2+6
=
8
EIGHT
8

 

TUTANKHAMEN

Christiane Desroches-Noblecourt 1963

Page 78

 "At the city limits of Amarna (Akhetaten), the capital where Amenophis IV -Akhenaten appears to have settled in the year 5, there was a bopndary stele of the year 6, with an additional inscription of the following year, renewing the vows of dedication of the city and to which was added a portrait of the third daughter, Ankhesenpaaten. It was in the year 6 that the Amarnan king changed his name from Amenophis to Akhenaten."

 

 

8

14

+
=
22
2+2
=
4

9
A
K
H
E
T
A
T
E
N

1
11
8
5
20
1
20
5
14

+
=
85
8+5
=
13
1+3
=
4

1+1

2+0

2+0

1+4

2

2

2

5

1

8
5

1

5

+
=
20
2+0
=
2

1
2
8
5
2
1
2
5
5

+
=
31
3+1
=
4

FOUR
4

9
A
K
H
E
T
A
T
E
N

1
11
8
5
20
1
20
5
14

+
=
85
8+5
=
13
1+3
=
4

1
2
8
5
2
1
2
5
5

+
=
31
3+1
=
4

FOUR
4

9
19

+
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
=
1
5
I
S
L
A
M

9
19
12
1
13

+
=
54
5+4
=
9

1+9
1+2

1+3

10
3

4

1+0

1

9

1

+
=
10
1+0
=
1

9
1
3
1
4

+
=
18
1+8
=
9
NINE
9

5
I
S
L
A
M

9
19
12
1
13

+
=
54
5+4
=
9

9
1
3
1
4

+
=
18
1+8
=
9
NINE
9

19

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1
7
M
A
Q
S
U
R
A

13
1
17
19
21
18
1

+
=
90
9+0
=
9

1+3

1+7
1+9
2+1
1+8

4

8
10
3
9

1+0

1

1

1

+
=
2

4
1
8
1
3
9
1

+
=
27
2+7
=
9
NINE
9

7
M
A
Q
S
U
R
A

13
1
17
19
21
18
1

+
=
90
9+0
=
9

4
1
8
1
3
9
1

+
=
27
2+7
=
9
NINE
9

9
14

+
=
23
2+3
=
5

6
M
E
D
I
N
A

13
5
4
9
14
1

+
=
46
4+6
=
10
1+0
=
1

1+3

1+4

4

5

5
4
9

1

+
=
19
1+9
=
10
1+0
=
1

4
5
4
9
5
1

+
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
=
1
ONE
1

6
M
E
D
I
N
A

13
5
4
9
14
1

+
=
46
4+6
=
10
1+0
=
1

4
5
4
9
5
1

+
=
28
2+8
=
10
1+0
=
1
ONE
1

 Fingerprints of the Gods

Graham Hancock 1995

Page 71 "Osiris, The ancient Egyptian high god of death and resurrection."

"…He was plotted against by seventy-two members of his court, led by his brother- in -law Set..."

"… Set, out hunting in the marshes, discovered the coffer, opened it and in a mad fury cut the royal corpse into fourteen pieces,"

seventy-two x fourteen

72 x 14

1008

Ra and the Eight

Page 273 / 274

 "The precessional numbers highlighted by Sellers in the Osiris myth are 360, 72 ,30, and 12."

"72 = the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete a precessional shift of one degree along with the ecliptic;"

On direction from the Alizzed, the scribe returned to the matter of still waters, running deep.

 

 

 

 THE POETICS OF ASCENT  Theories of Language in a Rabbinic Ascent Text. Naomi Janowitz 1989

" . . .The sound swells and bursts out in a mighty rush - Holy, holy, holy, Lord of host, the whole earth is full of his glory.

 

FINGERPRINTS Of THE GODS 1996 Edition

Graham Hancock

Page 490 / 491 / / 490 + 491 = 981 9 + 8 + 1= 18 1 + 8 = 9

 Page 490 4 x 9 = 36 3 + 6 = 9

"The novelist Arthur Koestler, who had a great interest in synchronicity, coined the term 'library angel' to describe the unknown agency responsible for the lucky breaks researchers sometimes get which lead /

Page 491 / to exactly the right information being placed in their hands at exactly the right moment."

 

LOOKING GLASS UNIVERSE

John P Briggs and F. David Peat

"…Its impossible to say just when the quantum revolution started. By some calculations, it began at the turn of the century

- but it took well over two decades before anyone really suspected that a paradigm shift was under way.

"…The ancient Greeks believed the atom to be the ultimate unit of matter, the indivisible part out of which all other parts

are made. Early twentieth-century physicists had discovered that this indivisible atom itself had 'parts'. The proton

and electron, and they devised various pictures of how these fit together.

The great experimentalist Ernest Rutherford proposed the most convincing model. Rutherford said the atom was like a tiny solar system, with a massive central core surrounded by lighter orbiting electrons.

Niels Bohr had thought about this appealing model and realized there was something seriously wrong with it. When the laws of classical physics were applied to the minature solar system, a paradox appeared. Calculations said the orbiting elec-trons should give off energy and spiral down into the nucleus.Measured on human time scales, this orbital decay would happen in the blink of an eye. Theoretically, therefore, all atoms should collapse in a moment. And since everything is composed of atoms, there should be no stability in all the universe. Such / Page 36 / things as mountains and stones would be impossible. Obviously this wasn't the case. Bohr therefore proposed a triumphant and far-reaching new model to solve this paradox. He discovered it by combining two clues"

Page 37 Diagram omitted " In our solar system, the planets are continually losing energy and spiralling gradually towards the sun. We don't notice this because the scale of our solar system is so large. Bohr saw that Rutherford's atomic solar system, because its scale is so small, would seem to us to collapse in a moment."

"…"Scientists knew that the distance between the lines in the spectral fingerprint of an element could be represented / Page 38 / mathematically by particularly simple numerical formulae, but they didn't know what the lines or the formulae meant. Bohr guessed that the spectral lines must correspond in some way to the energy of the electron as it orbited around the atom. As the atom is exited in a flame, one of its electrons jumps to higher and higher orbits, something akin to a pianist going up the scale At each jump it gives off some energy which appears as a line on the spectrum. Bohr had got that far in his thinking, but he didn't know what governed the electron orbits. Why were they spaced according to such simple formulae? Why did the electron take only fixed (discrete) steps instead of spiralling up or down to its new orbit the way a planet or satellite does? "

To answer these questions, Bohr turned to his second clue the quantum of Max Plank.

"…Plank proposed the bizarre idea that light energy can be emitted and absorbed in discrete or separate units he called 'quanta'.

"…Albert Einstein, won a Nobel Prize for showing that indeed energy does possess a particle-like nature.

 

Page 39 "…With Planck's and Einstein's dis-covery, the first of what have come to be known as the quantum paradoxes was born: light and other forms of energy have a dual personality - at times behaving like a wave and at times like a particle!"

"…Bohr put together his two clues, the discrete quantum and the spectral lines, then applied them to Rutherford's atomic solar system and derived a suprising new model of the atom. What Bohr proposed was that the possible energy levels for an atom are 'quantized' that is they are fixed and discrete. An electron can move only in certain separated orbits, almost like a set of grooves drawn around the nucleus. An electron can,t lose or gain energy in a continuous way, spiralling to higher or lower orbits; it takes in or throws off a packet (Quantum) of energy and leaps from one groove to the other like a rabbit disappearing and reappearing discontinuously in various hats.

In the hydrogen atom, which Rutherford said had one elec-tron in orbit, if a quantum packet of light energy is absorbed, the /

Page 40 / electron jumps to a higher orbit. In this case, whether it jumps to the orbit next door or twelve orbits away depends on how big a quantum of energy it takes in.And if the hydrogen electron is in an outer orbit and emits (gives off) a quantum, it leaps discon-tinuously (like a magical rabbit) down to a lower orbit. In either direction, the electron can only occupy the fixed orbits, nothing in between. None knows how the electron travels from one orbit to another. Each quantum jump, up or down, will be /

 

Diagram omitted

The electron (rabbit ) jumps discontinuously from orbit to orbit by taking in or emitting quanta. The rabbit leaves a record of her magical jump as a line on the emission spectrum.

 

THE MORNING OF THE MAGICIANS

Lois Pauwels and Jacques Bergier 1860

Page 226 "...dreams can foretell even distant future events,* and two German 'esearch workers, Moufang and Stevens, in a work entitled The Mystery of Dreams have cited a number of cases, which have been :arefully checked, in which dreams revealed future events and led 0 important scientific discoveries.

The celebrated atomic scientist, Niels Bohr, when he was a itudent, had a strange dream. He saw himself on a Sun consisting )f burning gas. Planets whizzed by, whistling as they passed. They ~ere attached to the Sun by thin filaments, and revolved round it. )uddenly the gas solidified and the Sun and planets crumbled lway. Niels Bohr then woke up and realized that he had just dis- :overed the model of the atom, so long sought after. The 'Sun'

~s the fixed centre round which the electrons revolve. The whole i )f. modem atomic physics and its applications have come out of

his dream. !

The chemist Augusta Kekule tells the following story: 'One I lUD1lDer's evening I was on the platform of my bus, on my way home, . IDd went to sleep. I saw clearly and distinctly how, on every side, ,

he atoms united in couples which were then merged in larger :roups which, in their turn, were attracted by others still more 10werfu1; and all these corpuscles were spinning round in a frenzied lance. I spent part of that night transcribing what I had seen in my !ream. I had hit upon the theory of atomic structure.'

THE BOOK OF THE DEAD

E.A.Wallis Budge 1899

 

Chap.cxxxi.5] OF LIVING NIGH UNTO RA

Page 397 "Chapter CXXXI

[From the Papyrus of Nu (Brit. Mus. No. 10,477 sheets 17 and 18).]

Vignette: This Chapter is without vignette, both in the Papyrus of Nu and in the Saite Recension (see Lepsius, op cit., BL.54)

Text: (1) THE CHAPTER OF HAVING EXISTENCE NIGH UNTO RA.1

The overseer of the house of the

overseer of the seal, Nu, triumphant, saith: -

 

"I am that god Ra who shineth in the night. Every

"(2) being who followeth in his train shall have life in

" the following of the god Thoth, and he shall give

"unto him the risings of Horus in the darkness. The

"heart of Osiris Nu, the overseer of the house of the

"overseer of the seal, triumphant, is glad (3) because

" he is one of those beings, and his enemies have been

"destroyed by the divine princes. Iam a follower of

"Ra, and [I have] received his iron weapon. (4) I

"have come unto thee, O my father Ra, and I have

"advanced to the god Shuu I have cried unto the

"mighty goddess, I have equipped the god Hu,(5) and

"I alone have removed the Nebt god from the path of

"Ra. I, am a Khu and I have come to the divine

/ "prince at the bounds of the horizon I have met

Page 398 / "(6) and I have received the mighty goddess. I have

"raised up thy soul in the following of thy strength,

"and my soul [liveth] through thy victory and thy

"mighty power; it is I who give commands (7) in

"speech to Ra in heaven. Homage to thee, O great

"god in the east of heaven, let me embark in thy boat,

"O Ra, let me open myself out in the form of a divine

"hawk, (8) let me give my commands in words, let me

"do battle in my Sekhem (?), let me be master under

"my vine. Let me embark in thy boat, O Ra, in

"peace, (9) and let me sail in peace to the beautiful

"Amentet. Let the god Tem speak unto me, [saying],

"Wouldst [thou] enter therein?' The lady, the

"goddess Mehen, is a million of years, yea, two million

"years in (10) duration, and dwelleth in the house of

"Urt and Nif-urt [and in] the Lake of a million years;

"the whole company of the gods move about among

"those who are at the side of him who is the lord of

"divisions of places (?). And I say, 'On every road

"and among (11) these millions of years is Ra the lord,

"and his path is in the fire; and they go round about

"behind him, and they go round about behind him.' "

 

 

LOOKING GLASS UNIVERSE

John P Briggs and F. David Peat  

"...Bohr guessed that the spectral lines must correspond in some way to the energy of the electron as it orbited around the atom. As the atom is exited in a flame, one of its electrons jumps to higher and higher orbits, something akin to a pianist going up the scale At each jump it gives off some energy which appears as a line on the spectrum. Bohr had got that far in his thinking, but he didn't know what governed the electron orbits. Why were they spaced according to such simple formulae? Why did the electron take only fixed (discrete) steps instead of spiralling up or down to its new orbit the way a planet or satellite does? "  

"...The great experimentalist Ernest Rutherford proposed the most convincing model. Rutherford said the atom was like a tiny solar system, with a massive central core surrounded by lighter orbiting electrons."

"...Niels Bohr had thought about this appealing model and realized there was something seriously wrong with it. When the laws of classical physics were applied to the minature solar system, a paradox appeared. Calculations said the orbiting elec-trons should give off energy and spiral down into the nucleus.Measured on human time scales, this orbital decay would happen in the blink of an eye. Theoretically, therefore, all atoms should collapse in a moment. And since everything is composed of atoms, there should be no stability in all the universe."

Page 37 " In our solar system, the planets are continually losing energy and spiralling gradually towards the sun. We don't notice this because the scale of our solar system is so large. Bohr saw that Rutherford's atomic solar system, because its scale is so small, would seem to us to collapse in a moment."

THE MORNING OF THE MAGICIANS

Lois Pauwels and Jacques Bergier 1960

Page 226 "...

"...The celebrated atomic scientist, Niels Bohr, when he was a itudent, had a strange dream. He saw himself on a Sun consisting )f burning gas. Planets whizzed by, whistling as they passed. They were attached to the Sun by thin filaments, and revolved round it. )uddenly the gas solidified and the Sun and planets crumbled lway. Niels Bohr then woke up and realized that he had just dis- :overed the model of the atom, so long sought after. The 'Sun'

~s the fixed centre round which the electrons revolve. The whole i )f. modem atomic physics and its applications have come out of

his dream. !

The chemist Augusta Kekule tells the following story: 'One I lUD1lDer's evening I was on the platform of my bus, on my way home, . IDd went to sleep. I saw clearly and distinctly how, on every side, ,

he atoms united in couples which were then merged in larger :roups which, in their turn, were attracted by others still more 10werfu1; and all these corpuscles were spinning round in a frenzied lance. I spent part of that night transcribing what I had seen in my !ream. I had hit upon the theory of atomic structure.'  

 

LOOKING GLASS UNIVERSE

John P Briggs and F. David Peat    

The great experimentalist Ernest Rutherford proposed the most convincing model. Rutherford said the atom was like a tiny solar system, with a massive central core surrounded by lighter orbiting electrons.

Page 37 "...In our solar system, the planets are continually losing energy and spiralling gradually towards the sun. We don't notice this because the scale of our solar system is so large. Bohr saw that Rutherford's atomic solar system, because its scale is so small, would seem to us to collapse in a moment."  

THE MORNING OF THE MAGICIANS

Lois Pauwels and Jacques Bergier 1960

Page 226 "...

"...The celebrated atomic scientist, Niels Bohr, when he was a itudent, had a strange dream. He saw himself on a Sun consisting of burning gas. Planets whizzed by, whistling as they passed. They were attached to the Sun by thin filaments, and revolved round it. )uddenly the gas solidified and the Sun and planets crumbled lway. Niels Bohr then woke up and realized that he had just dis- :overed the model of the atom, so long sought after. The 'Sun'

~s the fixed centre round which the electrons revolve. The whole i )f. modem atomic physics and its applications have come out of

his dream. !

 

THE BOOK OF THE DEAD

E.A.Wallis Budge 1899

Page 397 Chap.cxxxi.5] OF LIVING NIGH UNTO RA

 

[From the Papyrus of Nu (Brit. Mus. No. 10,477 sheets 17 and 18).]  

"...the whole company of the gods move about among

"those who are at the side of him who is the lord of

"divisions of places (?). And I say, 'On every road

"and among (11) these millions of years is Ra the lord,

"and his path is in the fire; and they go round about

"behind him, and they go round about behind him.' "  

 

 

Bohr . . . "He saw himself on a Sun consisting of burning gas. Planets whizzed by, whistling as they passed."

Rutherford." the atom was like a tiny solar system, with a massive central core surrounded by lighter orbiting electrons."

RA. . . "...and his path is in the fire; and they go round about behind him, and they go round about behind him. "  

 

CASSELL'S 1968 English Dictionary

planet (plan et)O.F. planete, late L. planlta, Gr. planetis, from planan, to lead astray, Planasthaiz to wander], n. A heavenly hody revolving rouna the sun, either as a primary planet in a nearly cir- cular orbit or as a secondary planet or satellite revolving round a primary; (Ancient Astron.) one of the major planets, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupi- ter, Saturn, together with the sun and moon, dis- ringuished from other heavenly bodies as having an apparent motion of its own.  

MAGIC and MYSTERY in TIBET

Alexandra David-Neel 1965

Page 123

"Some lamas undertake tours to perform chod near 108 lakes, and 108 cemeteries. "

 

GOD'SECRET FORMULA

Peter Plichta 1997

Page 122 continues

"The number 81 is the product of 3 x 3 x 3 x 3; 3 4 = 81. The numbers 3, 4, and 81 had been on my mind for years, and suddenly their interrelation appeared as a ' 3- to-the-power-of- law '.

If God had simply arranged the 81 elements according to the ordinal numbers 1, 2, 3, …81, researchers would have discovered this fact a long time ago."

 

V
E
N
U
S

add to reduce

22
5
14
21

19

+
=
81

8 + 1 = 9

2+2

5

1+4

2+1

1+9

4
5
5
3

1+0

reduce to deduce

4
5
5
3
1

+
=
18

1+8
=
NINE
9

4
H
O
R
U
S

8
15
18
21
19

+
=
62
6+2
=
8

1+5
1+8
2+1
1+9

6
9
3
10

+
=
28

8

+
=
8

8
6
9
3

+
=
26
2+6
=
8
EIGHT
8

 

 

4
H
O
U
R
S

8
15
21
18

+
=
62
6+2
=
8

1+5
2+1
1+8

6
3
9

8

+
=
8

8
6
3
9

+
=
26
2+6
=
8
EIGHT
8

8
6
3
9
1
+
=
27
2+7
=
9
NINE
9

4
H
O
U
R
S

8
15
21
18

+
=
62
6+2
=
8

8
6
3
9

+
=
26
2+6
=
8
EIGHT
8

8
6
3
9
1
+
=
27
2+7
=
9
NINE
9

 

 

 

HOLY BIBLE

Scofield References

Page 1353 Chapter 22 A.D. 96.

Verse 13

"On the east three gates; on the north; three gates; on the south three gates; and on the west three gates. "

3 + 3 + 3 + 3

GODS SECRET FORMULA

Peter Plichta 1995

"The number 81 is the product of 3 x 3 x 3 x 3; 3 4 = 81"

 

 
S
U
N

add to reduce

19
21
14

+
=

54
5 + 4 = 9

1+9
2+1
1+4

10
3
5

+
=

18

1+0
3
5

reduce to deduce

1
3
5

+
=
9
NINE
9

M

E

R

C

U

R
Y

add to reduce

13
5

18
3
21
18
25

+
=

103

1 + 0 + 3 = 3

1+3
5

1+8

3

2+1

1+8
2+5

reduce to deduce

4
5
9
3
3
9
7

+
=
40

4+0
=
FOUR
4

V
E
N
U
S

add to reduce

22
5
14
21

19

+
=
81

8 + 1 = 9

2+2

5

1+4

2+1

1+9

4
5
5
3

1+0

reduce to deduce

4
5
5
3
1

+
=
18

1+8
=
NINE
9

E
A
R
T
H

add to reduce

5
1
18
20
8

+
=
52

5 + 2 = 7

5
1

1+8
2+0
8

5
1
9
2
8

+
=
25
2+5
=
SEVEN
7

M
O
O
N

add to reduce

13
15
15
14

+
=
57

5 + 7 = 12

1+3
1+6

1+6

1+4

reduce to deduce

4
6
6
5

+
=
21

2+1
=
THREE
3

M
A
R
S

add to reduce

13
1
18
19

+
=
51

5 + 1 = 6

1+3
1

1+8

1+9

4
1
9

1+0

reduce to deduce

4
1
9
1

+
=
15
1+5
=
SIX
6

J
U
P
I
T
E
R

add to reduce

10
21
16
9
20
5
18

+
=
99

9+9
18

1+8
=
9
9 + 0 = 9

1+0
2+1

1+6
9

2+0
5
1+8

reduce to deduce

1

3

7
9
2
5
9

+
=
36
3+6
=

9
NINE
9

S
A
T
U
R
N

add to reduce

19
1
20
21
18
14

+
=
93

9 + 3 = 12

1+9
1
2+0
2+1
1+8
1+4

1+0
1
2
3
9
5

reduce to deduce

1
1
2
3
9
5

+
=
21

2+1
THREE
3

U
R
A
N
U
S

add to deduce

21
18
1
14
21
19

+
=
94

9 + 4 = 13

2+1
1+8
1
5
3
1+9

3
9
1
5
3
1+0

reduce to deduce

3
9
1
5
3
1

+

22

2+2
FOUR
4

N
E
P
T
U
N
E

add to reduce

14
5
16
20
21
14
5

+
=
95

9 + 5 = 14

1+4
5
1+6
2+0
2+1
1+4
5

reduce to deduce

5
5
7
2
3
5
5

+
=

32
3 + 2
=
FIVE
5

P
L
U
T
O

add to reduce

16
12
21
20
15

+
=
84

8 + 4 = 12

1+6
1+2
2+1

2+0
1+5

reduce to deduce

7
3
3
2
6

+
=
21
2+1
=
THREE
3

SUN
Number of letters in word
THREE

3

MOON

FOUR

4

MARS

FOUR

4

EARTH

FIVE

5

VENUS

FIVE

5

PLUTO

FIVE

5

SATURN

SIX

6

URANUS

SIX

6

JUPITER

SEVEN

7

MERCURY

SEVEN

7

NEPTUNE

SEVEN

7

 

 

SUN
Number of letters in word
THREE

3
=
3

3

MOON

FOUR

4

MARS

FOUR

4

4+ 4
=
8

8

EARTH

FIVE

5

VENUS

FIVE

5

PLUTO

FIVE

5

5+5+5
=
15

1 + 5
=
6

SATURN

SIX

6

URANUS

SIX

6

6+6
=
12
1+2
=
3

JUPITER

SEVEN

7

MERCURY

SEVEN

7

NEPTUNE

SEVEN

7

7+7+7
=
21
2+1
=
3

 

 JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

 A COMMON CULTURE WITH ALIENS?

Page 23

"Searches for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) are being spearheaded by scientists at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California. The efforts have concentrated on searches for radio transmissions that could be artificial in origin, and have used various large radio telescopes around the world. This option is familiar also from fictional depictions such as Carl Sagan's Contact (in which it generally pays off). But radio is not the only conceivable channel: narrow-beamed lasers could span interstellar distances with a modest power consumption. We already have the technology, if we so wish, to proclaim our presence many light-years away by either of these methods; indeed, the combined effects of all radio transmitters, radars and so forth would in any case reveal us to any aliens with sensitive radio telescopes. We know so little about the origin and potentialities of life that it is hard to assess what method for detecting it is best. So it is sensible to use every av~lable technique and be alert to all possibilities. But we should be mindful of 'observational selection': even if we do discover something, we can't infer that it is 'typical', because our instruments and techniques restrict us to detecting a biased and incomplete selection of what may actually be out there.

There may be no other intelligent life elsewhere. Even if there is, it may be on some water-covered world where super-dolphins enjoy a contemplative oceanic life, doing nothing to reveal themselves. There are heavy odds against success, but systematic scans for artificial signals are a worthwhile gamble because of the philosophical import of any detection. / Page 24 / A manifestly artificial signal-even if it were as boring as lists of prime numbers, or the digits of 'pi' - would imply that 'intelli-gence' wasn't unique to the Earth and had evolved elsewhere. The nearest potential sites are so far away that signals would take many years in transit. For this reason alone, transmission would be primarily one-way. There would be time to send a measured response, but no scope for quick repartee!

Any remote beings who could communicate with us would have some concepts of mathematics and logic that paralleled our own. And they would also share a knowledge of the basic particles and forces that govern our universe. Their habitat may be very different (and the biosphere even more different) from ours here on Earth; but they, and their planet, would be made of atoms just like those on Earth. For them, as for us, the most important particles would be protons and electrons: one electron orbiting a proton makes a hydrogen atom, and electric currents and radio transmitters involve streams of electrons. A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence' able and motivated to transmit radio signals. All the basic forces and natural laws would be the same. Indeed, this uniformity - without which our universe would be a far more baffling place - seems to extend to the remotest galaxies that astronomers can study. (Later chapters in this book will, however, speculate about other 'universes', forever beyond range of our telescopes, where different laws may prevail.)

Clearly, alien beings wouldn't use metres, kilograms or seconds. But we could exchange information about the ratios of two masses (such as the ratio of proton and electron masses) or of two lengths, which are 'pure numbers' that don't depend on what units are used: the statement that one rod is ten times as long as another is true (or false) whether we measure / Page 25 / lengths in feet or metres or some alien units. As Richard Feynman noted, he could tell extraterrestrials that he was 'seventeen billion hydrogen atoms high' and they should understand him.

Some 'intelligences' could exist with no intellectual affinity to us whatsoever. But any beings who transmitted a signal to us must have achieved some mastery over their physical surroundings. If they had any powers of reflection, they would surely share our curiosity about the cosmic 'genesis event' from which we've all emerged. They would be likely to be interested in how our universe is structured into stars and galaxies, what it contains, how it is expanding, and its eventual destiny. These things would be part of the common culture that we would share with any aliens. They would note, as we do, that a few key numbers are crucial to our shared cosmic environment.

Six of these numbers are the theme of the present book. They determine key features of our universe: how it expands; whether planets, stars and galaxies can form; and whether there can be a 'chemistry' propitious for evolution. Moreover, the nature of our universe is remarkably sensitive to these numbers. If you imagine setting up a universe by adjusting six dials, then the tuning must be precise in order to yield a universe that could harbour life. Is this providence? Is it coincidence? Are these numbers the outcome of a 'theory of everything' that uniquely fixes them? None of these intelpre-tations seems compelling. Instead, I believe that the apparent 'tuning' intimates something even more remarkable: that our observable universe - all we can see out to the liInits of our telescopes - is just one pan of an ensemble, among which there is even a diversity of physical laws. This is speculation, but it is compatible with the best theories we have.

Page 26 / We know that there are planets orbiting other stars, just as the Earth orbits our own star, the Sun. We may wonder what habitats they offer. Is their gravity too weak to retain an atmosphere? Are they too hot, too cold, or too dry to harbour life? Probably only a few offer an environment conducive for life. So, on a much grander scale, there may be innumerable other universes that we cannot observe because light from them can never reach us. Would they be propitious for the kind of evolution that has happened on at least one planet around at least one star in our 'home' universe? In most of them, the six numbers could be different: only a few universes would then be 'well tuned' for life. We should not be surprised that, in our universe, the numbers seem providentially tuned, any more than we should be surprised to find ourselves on a rather special planet whose gravity can retain an atmosphere, where the temperature allows water to exist, and that is orbiting a stable long-lived star."

 

ZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZAZA

JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

Page 24

"A manifestly artificial signal-even if it were as boring as lists of prime numbers, or the digits of 'pi' - would imply that 'intelli- gence' wasn't unique to the Earth and had evolved elsewhere. The nearest potential sites are so far away that signals would take many years in transit. For this reason alone, transmission would be primarily one-way. There would be time to send a measured response, but no scope for quick repartee!

Any remote beings who could communicate with us would have some concepts of mathematics and logic that paralleled our own. And they would also share a knowledge of the basic particles and forces that govern our universe. Their habitat may be very different (and the biosphere even more different) from ours here on Earth; but they, and their planet, would be made of atoms just like those on Earth. For them, as for us, the most important particles would be protons and electrons: one electron orbiting a proton makes a hydrogen atom, and electric currents and radio transmitters involve streams of electrons. A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence' able and motivated to transmit radio signals. All the basic forces and natural laws would be the same."

 Page 24

" A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence' "

 

JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

THE COSMOS AND THE MICROWORLD

Page 1

"Man is . . . related inextricably to all reality, known and unknowable. . . plankton, a shim- mering phosphorescence on the sea and the spinning planets and an expanding universe, all bound together by the elastic string of time. It is advisable to look from the tide pool to the stars and then back to the tide pool again."

John Steinbeck, The Log from the Sea of Cortez

 

SIX NUMBERS

"Mathematical laws underpin the fabric of our universe - not just atoms, but galaxies, stars and people. The properties of atoms - their sizes and masses, how many different kinds there are, and the forces linking them together - detemine the chemistry of our everyday world. The very existence of atoms depends on forces and particles deep inside them. The objects that astronomers study - planets, stars and galaxies - are controlled by the force of gravity. And everything takes place in the arena of an expanding universe, whose properties were imprinted into it at the time of the initial Big Bang.

Science advances by discerning patterns and regularities in nature, so that more and more phenomena can be subsumed into general categories and laws. Theorists aim to encapsulate the essence of the physical laws in a unified set of equations, / Page 2 / and a few numbers. There is still some way to go, but progress is remarkable.

This book describes six numbers that now seem especially significant. Two of them relate to the basic forces; two fix the size and overall 'texture' of our universe and determine whether it will continue for ever; and two more fix the proper- ties of space itself:

* The cosmos is so vast because there is one crucially im- portant huge number in nature, equal to 1,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000. This number measures the strength of the electrical forces that hold atoms together, divided by the force of gravity between them. If it had a few less zeros, only a short-lived mini-ature universe could exist: no creatures could grow larger than insects, and there would be no time for biological evolution.

* Another number," " E," "... whose value is 0.007, defines how firmly atomic nuclei bind together and how all the atoms on Earth were made. Its value controls the power from the Sun and, more sensitively, how stars transmute hydrogen into all the atoms of the periodic table. Carbon and oxygen are common, whereas gold and uranium are rare, because of what happens in the stars. If..." E" "...were 0.006 or 0.008, we could not exist.

* The cosmic number..." "...(omega) measures the amount of material in our universe - galaxies, diffuse gas, and 'dark matter'..." ... tells us the relative importance of gravity and expansion energy in the universe. If this ratio were too high relative to a particular 'critical' value, the universe would have collapsed long ago; had it been too low, no galaxies or / Page 3 / stars would have formed. The initial expansion speed seems to have been finely tuned.

* Measuring the fourth number, A (lambda), was the biggest scientific news of 1998. An unsuspected new force - a cosmic 'antigravity' - controls the expansion of our universe, even though it has no discernible effect on scales less than a billion light-years. It is destined to become ever more dominant over gravity and other forces as our universe becomes ever darker and emptier. Fortunately for us (and very surprisingly to theorists), A is very small. Otherwise its effect would have stopped galaxies and stars from forming, and cosmic evolu- tion would have been stifled before it could even begin.

* The seeds for all cosmic structures - stars, galaxies and clusters of galaxies - were all iInprinted in the Big Bang. The fabric of our universe depends on one number, Q which represents the ratio of two fundamental energies and is about 1/100,000 in value. If Q were even smaller, the universe would be inert and structureless; if Q were much larger, it would be a violent place, in which no stars or solar systems could survive, dominated by vast black holes.

* The sixth crucial number has been known for centuries, although it's now viewed in a new perspective. It is the number of spatial dimensions in our world," D".., and equals three. We couldn't exist if D were two or four. Tinle is a fourth dimension, but distinctively different from the others in that it has a built-in arrow: we 'move' only towards the future. Near black holes, space is so warped that light moves in circles, and time can stand still. Furthennore, close to the time of the Big Bang, and also on microscopic scales, space may reveal its deepest underlying structure of all: the / Page 4 / vibrations and harmonies of objects called 'superstrings', in a ten-dimensional arena.

Perhaps there are some connections between these numbers. At the moment, however, we cannot predict anyone of them from the values of the others. Nor do we know whether some 'theory of everything' will eventually yield a formula that interrelates them, or that specifies them uniquely. I have highlighted these six because each plays a crucial and distinc- tive role in our universe, and together they determine how the universe evolves and what its internal potentialities are; more-over, three of them (those that pertain to the large-scale universe) are only now being measured with any precision.

These six numbers constitute a 'recipe' for a universe. More-over, the outcome is sensitive to their values: if anyone of them were to be 'untuned', there would be no stars and no life. Is this tuning just a brute fact, a coincidence? Or is it the providence of a benign Creator? I take the view that it is neither. An infinity of other universes may well exist where the numbers are different. Most would be stillborn or sterile. We could only have emerged (and therefore we naturally now find ourselves) in a universe with the 'right' combination. This realization offers a radically new perspective on our universe, on our place in it, and on the nature of physical laws.

It is astonishing that an expanding universe, whose starting point is so 'simple' that it can be specified by just a few numbers, can evolve (if these numbers are suitably 'tuned') into our intricately structured cosmos. Let us first set the scene by viewing these structures on all scales, from atoms to galaxies.

 

Page 5

THE COSMOS THROUGH A ZOOM LENS

Start with a commonplace 'snapshot' - a man and woman - taken from a distance of a few metres. Then imagine the same scene from successively more remote viewpoints, each ten times further away than the previous one. The second frame shows the patch of grass on which they are reclining; the third shows that they are in a public park; the fourth reveals some tall buildings; the next shows the whole city; and the next-but- one a segment of the Earth's horizon, viewed from so high up that it is noticeably curved. Two frames further on, we en-counter a powerful image that has been familiar since the1960s: the entire Earth - continents, oceans, and clouds - with its biosphere seeming no more than a delicate glaze and contrasting with the arid features of its Moon.

Three more leaps show the inner Solar System, with the Earth orbiting the Sun further out than Mercury and Venus; the next shows the entire Solar System. Four frames on (a view from a few light-years away), our Sun looks like a star among its neighbours. After three more frames, we see the billions of similar stars in the flat disc of our Milky Way, stretching for tens of thousands of light-years. Three more leaps reveal the Milky Way as a spiral galaxy, along with Andromeda. From still further, these galaxies seem just two among hundreds of others - outlying members of the Virgo Cluster of galaxies. A further leap shows that the Virgo Cluster is itself just one rather modest cluster. Even if our imaginary telephoto lens had the power of the Hubble Space Telescope, our entire galaxy would, in the final frame, be a barely detectable smudge of light several billion light-years distant.

The series ends there. Our horizon extends no further, but it has taken twenty-five leaps, each by a factor of ten, to reach / Page 6 / the limits of our observable universe starting with the 'human' scale of a few metres.

The other set of frames zooms inward rather than outward. From less than one metre, we see an arm; from a few centimetres - as close as we can look with the unaided eye - a small patch of skin. The next frames take us into the fine textures of human tissue, and then into an individual cell (there are a hundred times more cells in our body than there are stars in our galaxy). And then, at the limits of a powerful microscope, we probe the realm of individual molecules: long, tangled strings of proteins, and the double helix of DNA.

The next 'zoom' reveals individual atoms. Here the fuzziness of quantum effects comes in: there is a limit to the sharpness of the pictures we can get. No real microscope can probe within the atom, where a swarm of electrons surrounds the positively charged nucleus, but substructures one hundred times smaller than atomic nuclei can be probed by studying what happens when other particles, accelerated to speeds approaching that of light, are crashed into them. This is the finest detail that we can directly measure; we suspect, however, that the underlying structures in nature may be 'superstrings' or 'quantum foam' on scales so tiny that they would require seventeen more zooms to reveal them.!

Our telescopes reach out to a distance that is bigger than a superstring (the smallest substructure postulated to exist within atoms) by a sixty-figure number: there would be sixty frames (of which present measurements cover forty-three) in our 'zoom lens' depiction of the natural world. Of these, our ordinary experience spans nine at most - from the smallest things our eyes can see, about a millimetre in size, to the distance logged on an intercontinental flight. This highlights something important and remarkable, which is so obvious that / Page 7 / we take it for granted: our universe covers a vast range of scales, and an immense variety of structures, stretching far larger, and far smaller, than the dimensions of everyday sensations.

LARGE NUMBERS AND DIVERSE SCALES

We are each made up of between 1028 and 1029 atoms. This 'human scale' is, in a numerical sense, poised midway between the masses of atoms and stars. It would take roughly as many human bodies to make up the mass of the Sun as there are atoms in each of us. But our Sun is just an ordinary star in the galaxy that contains a hundred billion stars altogether. There are at least as many galaxies in our observable universe as there are stars in a galaxy. More than 1078 atoms lie within range of our telescope.

Living organisms are configured into layer upon layer of complex structure. Atoms are assembled into complex mole- cules; these react, via complex pathways in every cell, and indirectly lead to the entire interconnected structure that makes up a tree, an insect or a human. We straddle the cosmos and the microworld - intermediate in size between the Sun, at a billion metres in diameter, and a molecule at a billionth of a metre. It is actually no coincidence that nature attains its maximum complexity on this intermediate scale: anything larger, if it were on a habitable planet, would be vulnerable to breakage or crushing by gravity.

We are used to the idea that we are moulded by the micro-world: we are vulnerable to viruses a millionth of a metre in length, and the minute DNA double-helix molecule encodes our total genetic heritage. And it's just as obvious that we depend on the Sun and its power. But what about the still / Page 8 / vaster scales? Even the nearest stars are millions of times further away than the Sun, and the known cosmos extends a billion times further still. Can we understand why there is so much beyond our Solar System? In this book I shall describe several ways in which we are linked to the stars, arguing that we cannot understand our origins without the cosmic context.

The intimate connections between the 'inner space' of the subatomic world and the 'outer space' of the cosmos are illustrated by the picture in Figure 1.1 - an ouraborus, described by Encyclopaedia Britannica as the 'emblematic serpent of an-cient Egypt and Greece, represented with its tail in its mouth continually devouring itself and being reborn from itself. . . [It] expresses the unity of all things, material and spirituaL which never disappear but perpetually change form in an eternal cycle of destruction and re-creation'.

On the left in the illustration are the atoms and subatomic particles; this is the 'quantum world'. On the right are planets, stars and galaxies. This book will highlight some remarkable interconnections between the microscales on the left and the macroworld on the right. Our everyday world is determined by atoms and how they combine together into molecules, miner- als and living cells. The way stars shine depends on the nuclei within those atoms. Galaxies may be held together by the gravity of a huge swarm of subnuclear particles. Symbolized 'gastronomically' at the top, is the ultimate synthesis that still eludes us - between the cosmos and the quantum.

Lengths spanning sixty powers of ten are depicted in the ouraborus. Such an enormous range is actually a prerequisite for an 'interesting' universe. A universe that didn't involve large numbers could never evolve a complex hierarchy of structures: it would be dull, and certainly not habitable. And there must be long timespans as well. Processes in an atom may / Page 9 / take a millionth of a billionth of a second to be completed; within the central nucleus of each atom, events are even faster. The complex processes that transform an embryo into blood, bone and flesh involve a succession of cell divisions, coupled with differentiation, each involving thousands of intricately orchestrated regroupings and replications of molecules; this activity never ceases as long as we eat and breathe. And our life is just one generation in humankind's evolution, an episode that is itself just one stage in the emergence of the totality of life.

The tremendous timespans involved in evolution offer a new perspective on the question 'Why is our universe so big?' The /

Page 9 / FIGURE 1.1 (omitted) The ouraborus. There are links between the microworld of panicles, nuclei and atoms (left) and the cosmos (right).

Page 10 / emergence of human life here on Earth has taken 4.5 billion years. Even before our Sun and its planets could form, earlier stan must have transmuted pristine hydrogen into carbon, oxygen and the other atoms of the periodic table. This has taken about ten billion years. The size of the observable universe is, roughly, the distance travelled by light since the Big Bang, and so the present visible universe must be around ten billion light-years across.

This is a startling conclusion. The very hugeness of our universe, which seems at first to signify how unimportant we are in the cosmic scheme, is actually entailed by our existence! This is not to say that there couldn't have been a smaller universe, only that we could not have existed in it. The expanse of cosmic space is not an extravagant superfluity; it's a consequence of the prolonged chain of events, extending back before our Solar System formed, that preceded our arrival on the scene.

This may seem a regression to an ancient 'anthropocentric' perspective - something that was shattered by Copernicus's revelation that the Earth moves around the Sun rather than vice versa. But we shouldn't take Copernican modesty (some- times called the 'principle of mediocrity') too far. Creatures like us require special conditions to have evolved, so our perspec- tive is bound to be in some sense atypical. The vastness of our universe shouldn't surprise us, even though we may still seek a deeper explanation for its distinctive features.

"CAN WE HOPE TO UNDERSTAND OUR UNIVERSE?"

 

 

 The Alizzed summed up in a word the words of Ra many moons ago

 Why lookee here said RA, Mary, with an M

 

 

 JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

THE COSMOS AND THE MICROWORLD

Page 8 / The intimate connections between the 'inner space' of the / subatomic world and the 'outer space' of the cosmos are illustrated by the picture in Figure 1.1 - an ouraborus, described by Encyclopaedia Britannica as the 'emblematic serpent of an- dent Egypt and Greece, represented with its tail in its mouth continually devouring itself and being reborn from itself. . . [It] expresses the unity of all things, material and spirituaL which never disappear but perpetually change form in an eternal cycle of destruction and re-creation'."

Page 9

" The ouraborus"

There are nine letters in . O . U . R . A . B . O . R . U . S . said Zed Aliz 

 

O
U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

6

6

1+5

1+5

15

15

O
U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

15
21
18
1
2

15
18
21
19

1+5

2+1

1+8

1+5

1+8
2+1
1+9

1+0

6
3
9

6
9
3
1

+
=
37

A
B

1
2

6
3
9
1
2
6
9
3
1

+
=

O
U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

21
18

18
21

2+1

1+8

1+8

2+1

3
9

9
3

O
U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

15

15

19

+
=
49
4+9
=

1+5

1+5

1+0

6

6

1

+
=
13

1+3
=

O
U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

18

18

1+8

1+8

9

9

H

O

U
R
A
B
O
R
U
S

 

 

 JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

 "...The intimate connections between the 'inner space' of the subatomic world and the 'outer space' of the cosmos are illustrated by the picture in Figure 1.1 - an ouraborus, described by Encyclopaedia Britannica as the 'emblematic serpent of an-cient Egypt and Greece, represented with its tail in its mouth continually devouring itself and being reborn from itself. . . [It] expresses the unity of all things, material and spirituaL which never disappear but perpetually change form in an eternal cycle of destruction and re-creation'.

Lengths spanning sixty powers of ten are depicted in the ouraborus..."

 

FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

GRAham Hancock 1995

 

 

 FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS

 GRAham Hancock 1995

"A Quest for the Beginning and the End"

Page 214

"Through these myths the voices of the ancients speak to us directly. What are they trying to say"

Tha's gorra laugh, said that far yonder, unsmilin scribe.

Through these maths the voices of the ancients speak to us directly. What are they trying to say

Page 116

"I felt myself drawn ever more deeply into the labrynths of that strange and awsome riddle..."

 

 

THE HOLY BIBLE 

 Scofield Reference

Page 648

 PSALM 102.

HEAR my prayer, 0 LORD, and let my cry come unto thee.

2. Hide not thy face from me in the day when I am in trouble; in-cline thine ear unto me: in the day when I call answer me speedily.

3. For my days are consumed like smoke, and my bones are burned as an hearth. .

4. My heart is smitten, and with-ered like grass; so that I forget to eat my bread.

5. By reason of the voice of my groaning my bones cleave to my skin.

6. I am like a pelican of the wilder- ness: I am like an owl of the desert.

7. I watch, and am as a sparrow alone upon the house top.

 

 A PELICAN IN THE WILDERNESS

Hermits Solitaries and Recluses

Isabel Colegate 2002

A man that Studies Happiness must sit alone like a

Sparrow upon the Hous Top, and like a Pelican in the Wilderness

Thomas Traherne (1637-74) 

 

THE HOLY BIBLE 

 Scofield Reference

 The law of the land: (2) the year of jubile.

8. And thou shalt number seven sabbaths of years unto thee, seven times seven years; and the space of the seven sabbaths of years shall be unto thee forty and nine years.

9. Then shalt thou cause the trum-pet of the jubile to sound on the tenth day of the seventh month, in the day of atonement shall ye make the trumpet sound throughout all your land.

 

Page 647 

 PSALM 98.

O SING unto the LORD a new, song; for che hath done mar- vellous things: his right hand, and his holy arm, hath gotten him the, victory.

2. The LORD hath made known his salvation: his righteousness hath he openly shewed in the sight of the heathen.

3. He hath remembered his mercy and his truth toward the house of Israel: fall the ends of the earth have seen the salvation of our God.

4. Make a joyful noise unto the LORD, all the earth: make a loud noise, and rejoice, and sing praise. g

5. Sing unto the LORD with the harp; with the harp, and the voice of a psalm.

6. With trumpets and sound of cornet make a joyful noise before' the LORD, the King.

7. Let the sea roar, and the fulness thereof; the world, and they that I dwell therein.

8 . Let the floods clap their hands: let the hills be joyful together

9. Before the LORD; for he com-eth to judge the earth: with right-eousness shall he judge .the wor:ld, and the people with equity.

PSALM 99.

THE LORD reigneth; let the peo-pIe tremble: he sitteth be-tween the cherubims; let the earth be moved.

2. The LORD is great in Zion; and he is high above all the people.

3. Let them praise thy great and terrible name; for it is holy.

4. The king's strength also loveth judgment; thou dost establish equity, thou executest judgment and righteousness in Jacob.

5. Exalt ye the LORD our God, and worship at his footstool; for he is holy.

6. Moses and Aaron among his priests, and Samuel among them that call upon his name; they called upon the LORD, and he answered them.

7. He spake unto them in the cloudy pillar: they kept his testi-monies, and the ordinance that he gave them.

8. Thou answeredst them, 0 LORD our God: thou wast a God that jfor- gavest them, though thou tookest vengeance of their inventions.

9. Exalt the LORD our God, and worship at his holy hill; for the, LORD our God is holy.

 

 The scribe made note not in the margin THAT there are 9 verses in PSALM 98 and 9 in PSALM 99

 further noting THAT the eighth verse of psalm 98 contains 12 words and THAT the ninth verse contains 22 and THAT 12 + 22 =

and left it at that.

 

P
S
A
L
M

 JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

 A COMMON CULTURE WITH ALIENS?

Page 24 2+4 = 6

 "Any remote beings who could communicate with us would have some concepts of mathematics and logic that paralleled our own. And they would also share a knowledge of the basic particles and forces that govern our universe. Their habitat may be very different (and the biosphere even more different) from ours here on Earth; but they, and their planet, would be made of atoms just like those on Earth. For them, as for us, the most important particles would be protons and electrons: one electron orbiting a proton makes a hydrogen atom, and electric currents and radio transmitters involve streams of electrons. A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence'..."

 

GODS OF THE DAWN

Peter Le Mesurier 1997, 1999

Page 124

"...This path will finally attain its culmination on 1st April, AD 33, when a sudden explosive initiative on the part of a transformer (or a transforming, explosive initiative) will contribute hugely to restoring humanity's balance and rein- tegration with the cosmos.

Once again biblical enthusiasts are not slow to pinpoint the events apparently referred to. The first of these dates, they claim, represents the birth of Jesus of Nazareth, and the second his crucifixion. And indeed, the dates do seem to fit,35 as do the symbolic consequences. Yet, once again, other salvationist initia- tives were in the air at the time, too, notably within Mahayana Buddhism.

With the entry into the Grand Gallery, all kinds of extraordinary things now start to happen. Initially, the ascending floor simply continues for a further 25 p", terminating in a small notch or 'peak' that once served to retain a bridging floorslab which sealed off the Queen's Chamber passage (see next chapter). To the right, a low tunnel beneath a missing ramp-stone, with its N-S axis 35.76 p" beyond the Gallery's south wall and its floor on the level of the Queen's Chamber floor, leads the explorer to the right, only to tumble at a point that lies 89.61 p" further on (code equivalent: 3 x 29.84 p") - measured from axis to axis - into the top end of the 'well shaft' leading down to the lower passageways (see previous chapter). Overhead, the roof height has suddenly leapt upwards by 286.1 p", while the 1836 P"-long roof (code equivalent: 153 x 12) / page 127 / displays 40 (8x5) separate blocks of limestone set rachet-wise, evidently to anchor them into the pyramid's masonary."  

Alizzed indicates an emphasis 

"...the 1836 P"-long roof (code equivalent: 153 x 12)..."    

"A proton is 1,836 times heavier than an electron, and the number 1,836 would have the same connotations to any 'intelligence'..."  

 

JUST SIX NUMBERS

The Deep Forces That Have Shaped The Universe

Martin Rees 1999

 

A COMMON CULTURE WITH ALIENS?